Coalition Testimony Group Presentation Rubric

Coalition Testimony Group Presentation Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Proficient Competent Novice Needs Improvement
Coalition description,
coordination/consistency
in messaging, coalition
members mission/goals
description
Weight 15.00%
90.0 o 100.00 %
• Name of coalition
and list of all
coalition members
represented in the
group is complete
and clearly provided.
• Description of the
coalition mission and
goals is complete,
and includes all
aspects highlighted
on the coalition web
page.
• Description of each
member organization
goals/mission are
thorough and clear.
• How each
organization can
contribute to the
selected policy is
explicitly and
thoroughly
described.
• One slide per
coalition member is
included.
• Presentation
demonstrates very
80.00 to 89.00 %
• Name of coalition and
list of all coalition
members
represented in the
group is somewhat
complete (one
member may be
missing).
• Description of the
coalition mission and
goals is mostly
complete, and
includes most all
aspects highlighted
on the coalition web
page.
• Description of each
member organization
goals/mission are
mostly clear, but
added details are
needed.
• How each
organization can
contribute to the
selected policy is
somewhat described.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• Name of coalition
and list of all
coalition members
represented in the
group is somewhat
complete (more than
one member may be
missing).
• Description of the
coalition mission and
goals is somewhat
complete, and
includes some of the
aspects highlighted
on the coalition web
page.
• Description of each
member
organization
goals/mission are
vague.
• How each
organization can
contribute to the
selected policy is
vaguely described.
0.00 to 65.00 %
• Name of coalition and
list of all coalition
members represented
in the group is not
complete.
• Description of the
coalition mission and
goals is not complete,
and is missing most of
the aspects
highlighted on the
coalition web page.
• Description of each
member organization
goals/mission are not
included.
• Some descriptions
may be missing.
• How each
organization can
contribute to the
selected policy is
vaguely described
and/or may be
missing.
• More than one slide
per coalition member
is included
clear understanding
and agreement of the
coalition and its
members focus.
• One slide per
coalition member is
included.
• Presentation
demonstrates
understanding and
agreement of the
coalition and its
members but this
may be less focused
or somewhat unclear.
• Overall, added
description is needed.
• More than one slide
per coalition
member is included
• Presentation does
not demonstrate
understanding and
agreement of the
coalition and its
members focus.
• Presentation
demonstrates an
unfocused and
malfunctioning
coalition. (members
are very inconsistent
in messaging)
Time efficiency and
requirement
Weight 15.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
• Each Testimony
meets the threeminute time limit.
• Testimony maximizes
the time for
messaging.
• Each point is well –
connected and makes
a strong case
80.00 to 89.00 %
• One testimony is
significantly longer or
shorter than others
or makes a weak
case.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• Testimony
inadequate to make
a case
• Testimony is far over
time Or several are
under 3 minutes.
0.00 to 65.00 %
• Missing one or more
members
contribution
Meta-Core messages /
Ask
Weight 15.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
• Messages and the
“ask” are strongly
stated, clear and
concise, and
consistent with the
problem statement
and policy advocacy.
• The coalition has
coordinated speaker
testimony so that all
the key points in the
background/ problem
statement are well
covered.
80.00 to 89.00 %
• Messages and the
“ask” are clear or
somewhat consistent
with the problem
statement and policy
advocacy.
• The coalition
coordination is
limited so that there
is some redundancy
65.00 to 79.00 %
• Messages and the
“ask” are unclear
and/ or inconsistent
with the problem
statement and policy
advocacy.
• The coalition
coordination is
missing, many
important messages
are missing and
there is redundancy
in details and
statements
0.00 to 65.00 %
• Missing one or more
members
contribution
Required components of
testimony
Weight 25.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
• All components
strong and clear from
all members.
• Identification of
organization
represented and
their standing is
included.
• Why policy issue is
important and why
advocating for it is
clearly described.
• Description of why
this policy is a
solution to the public
health problem is
strong and detailed.
• Ask clearly included.
• Back up statements,
facts and statistics or
personal experiences
are explicitly
included.
• A strong and
complete scholarly
reference is clearly
included from all
members.
• Thank you to the
members of the
hearing included
from all members.
80.00 to 89.00 %
• Most components
included for each
member, but some
may be unclear or
weak.
• Identification of
organization
represented and their
standing is included
from members.
• Why policy issue is
important and why
advocating for it is
included.
• Description of why
this policy is a
solution to the public
health problem has
some weaknesses
and needs more
detail.
• Ask could use
additional clarity.
• Back up statements,
facts and statistics or
personal experiences
are included, but
need additional
clarity.
• A partially complete
scholarly reference is
included from most
all members.
• Thank you to the
members of the
hearing is included
from some of the
members.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• Many components
are missing for each
member. Or many
portions are unclear
or weak.
• Identification of
organization
represented and
their standing is not
clearly stated from
one or more
members.
• Why policy issue is
important and why
advocating is weakly
included.
• The ask and
description of why
this policy is a
solution to the
public health
problem has many
weaknesses.
• Back up statements,
facts and statistics or
personal experiences
are not clearly
included.
• An incomplete
scholarly reference is
included from most
all members or not
at all.
• Thank you to the
members of the
hearing is not clearly
included. Required
components are
0.00 to 65.00 %
• Missing more than
one member’s
contribution.
missing from one
member’s
testimony.
Key Summarized Aspects
of Public Health Problem
Weight 20.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
Four key summarized
aspects of the public
health problem are
clearly and thoroughly
included using data and
statistics:
1) what is the issue,
2) who is affected,
3) economic impact
and
4) The policy solution is
explicitly included and
explained.
• Appropriate bill
numbers and
descriptions are
clearly explained.
• No more than four
slides for the
summary of the
coalition proposal
portion.
80.00 to 89.00 %
• Three key
summarized aspects
of the public health
problem proposal
problem steps (what
is the issue, who is
affected, economic
impact) are included,
using data and
statistics, but more
explanation and
description are
needed.
• The policy solution is
included but more
explanation is
needed.
• Appropriate bill
numbers and
descriptions are
included, but
somewhat unclear.
• More than four slides
are included in the
summary of the
coalition proposal
portion.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• More than one key
summarized aspects
of the public health
problem (what is the
issue, who is
affected, economic
impact) are missing
and additional data,
statistics and
description are
needed.
• The policy solution is
not clearly included.
• More than four
slides included for
the proposal
summary portion of
the presentation or
the information is
incomplete.
0.00 to 65.00 %
• One or more aspects
are not included in
the presentation. List
of members is not
included.
APA Citations and
References
Weight 3.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
• APA style in-text
citations used
throughout
document with no
errors.
80.00 to 89.00 %
• APA style in-text
citations used
throughout
document with minor
errors.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• APA style in-text
citations with major
errors and the
references page
contains less than
three sources,
0.00 to 65.00 %
• Missing citations or 2
or more references or
all references are not
in APA style.
• APA reference page
contains at least
three reliable or
scholarly sources and
has no formatting
errors.
• APA reference page
contains three
reliable or scholarly
sources but has minor
formatting errors.
and/or has major
formatting errors.
Timeliness
Weight 2.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
Presentation is
submitted by the due
date and time.
80.00 to 89.00 %
Presentation is submitted
less than 24 hours past
the due date and time.
65.00 to 79.00 %
Presentation is
submitted more than 24
hours past the due date
and time
0.00 to 64.00 %
Presentation is submitted
48 hours past the due
date and time.
Presentation
Appearance; Speaking
Style; Equitable Division
of Work
Weight 5.00%
90.00 to 100.00 %
• Appropriate amount
of text on slides.
• Content is clearly and
accurately presented.
• Slides are
appropriate for an
academic or
professional setting
(e.g., contrast,
terminology,
graphics).
• Speaker can be
clearly heard while
presenting.
• Work is equitably
shared among group
members and is
evident via either
recording or live
presentation.
80.00 to 89.00 %
• Content is somewhat
clearly and accurately
presented.
• Slides are appropriate
for an academic or
professional setting
(e.g., contrast,
terminology,
graphics), some
improvement is
needed.
• Speaker can be
heard, but there are
some audio issues
while presenting.
• Work is for the most
part equitably shared
among group
members and is
evident via either
recording or live
presentation.
65.00 to 79.00 %
• Content is lacking
clarity and accurate
presentation.
• Slides are not exactly
appropriate for an
academic or
professional setting
(e.g., contrast,
terminology,
graphics), some
improvement is
needed.
• It is difficult to hear
the speaker and/or
there are some
audio issues while
presenting.
• Work is somewhat
inequitably shared
among group
members and is
evident via either
recording or live
presentation.
0.00 to 64.00 %
• Inappropriate amount
of text on slides.
• Content not used
mostly for reading.
• Slides were not
appropriate for an
academic or
professional setting
(e.g., contrast,
terminology,
graphics).
• Some glaring audio
issues are prevalent.
• Work is not equitably
shared among group
members and is
evident via either
recording or live
presentation.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Coalition Testimony Group Presentation Rubric
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Still stressed from student homework?
Get quality assistance from academic writers!
error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
1
Need assignment help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp using +1 718 717 2861

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code LOVE