Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present

BUSI 643
CASE STUDY GRADING RUBRIC
Student:
Criteria
(100 Points) Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Topic, domains and
concepts
(35 points)
35 to 32 points
Clearly addresses the topic
assigned, stays on topic, evaluates
all domains, comprehensive in
content, uses terms and concepts
from reading, demonstrates clarity
of expression. Statements are
supported by at least 1 scholarly
source, correctly cited.
31 to 29 points
Addresses the topic assigned, stays
on topic, evaluates most domains,
discusses content, uses terms and
concepts from reading,
demonstrates clarity of expression.
Statements are supported by at least
1 scholarly source.
28 to 1 points
Does a poor to fair job of addressing
the topic assigned, stays on topic,
evaluates some domains, discusses
content, uses terms and concepts
from reading, demonstrates clarity
of expression. Statements are
supported by at least 1 scholarly
source.
0 points
Failing. Student shows evidence
of refusal or inability to provide
the required content.
Work Habits
(30 points)
30 to 28 points
Superior work in all areas. Student
consistently exceeds minimal
expectations in all areas regarding
content analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation of topics, participation,
timeliness, and writing style.
27 to 25 points
Good work in most areas. Student
demonstrates minor deficiencies in
some areas regarding content,
analysis, writing style, and/or
participation.
24 to 1 points
Poor to fair work in most areas.
Student exhibits need for
improvement in most areas
regarding content, analysis, writing
style, and/or participation.
0 points
Failing. Student shows evidence
of refusal or inability to meet
minimum standards of work.
Personal application
(5 points)
5 points
The student provides thorough
applications as a result of his/her
professional life.
4 points
The student provides good
applications as a result of his/her
professional life.
3 to 1 points
The student provides poor to fair
applications as a result of his/her
professional life.
0 points
The student provides zero
applications as a result of his/
her professional life.
Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
APA Formatting
(10 points)
10 points
APA format followed, organizes
content under APA headings, no
large filler quotes, clearly does not
plagiarize, clearly finds supportive
reasons in reading and applies
them in the case study. APAformatted reference list and in-text
citations are included.
9 to 8 points
APA format followed most of the
time, incorrect headings used, no
large filler quotes, does not
plagiarize, finds supportive reasons
in reading and applies them in the
case study. Reference list, in-text
citations, and headings contain 2 –
5 errors.
7 to 1 points
APA format inconsistent throughout;
missing headings; some large filler
quotes; does not plagiarize; finds
few supportive reasons in reading
and applies them in the case study;
reference list, in-text citations, and
headings contain more than 5 errors.
0 points
APA format was not followed;
large filler quotes present; does
not plagiarize; does not find
supportive reasons in reading or
apply them in the case study;
reference list and in-text
citations are not included.
Page 1 of 3
BUSI 643
Page 2 of 3
BUSI 643
Spelling, Grammar
and Mechanics
(10 points)
10 points
The Case Study begins with a title/
cover page and was typed in 12-
point Times New Roman fonts on
all pages; all pages were doublespaced; 1-inch margins on all four
sides were used.
Correct spelling and grammar
were present throughout.
Correct punctuation and spacing
were present throughout.
The paper was typed in a formal
style, and written in the third
person.
No more than 1 error was present.
9 to 8 points
Some errors with the title/cover
page, 12-point Times New Roman
fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch
margins were present.
Some errors with spelling and/or
grammar were present.
Some errors with punctuation and
spacing were present.
Some errors with formal style and/
or third person were present.
2 – 5 errors were present.
7 to 1 points
Significant errors with the title/cover
page, 12-point Times New Roman
fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch
margins were present.
Significant errors with spelling and/
or grammar were present.
Significant errors with punctuation
and spacing were present.
Significant errors with formal style
and/or third person were present.
More than 5 errors were present.
0 points
Errors with spelling, grammar,
and/or mechanics were so
pervasive that the readability
and level of scholarship of the
paper were substantially
reduced.
Page count
(10 points)
10 points
At least 3 complete pages of
original graduate-level analysis,
evaluation, and discussion (plus
title page, reference page, and
tables or figures).
9 to 8 points
At least 2.9 pages of original
graduate-level analysis, evaluation,
and discussion (plus title page,
reference page, and tables or
figures).
7 to 1 points
2.0 – 2.8 pages of original graduatelevel analysis, evaluation, and
discussion (plus title page, reference
page, and tables or figures).
0 points
Less than 2 pages submitted.
/100
Page 3 of 3