Criteria Ratings Points Key Components of Peer

Criteria Ratings Points
Key
Components
of Peer
Critique
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
All of the following key
components are
thoroughly addressed
regarding the assigned
peer’s critique:
• Evaluation of the peers
critique • Sought
additional literature
supporting or contesting
the original article or
critique • A written
critique of the assigned
peer critique
9 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
The following key
components are
proficiently addressed
regarding the assigned
peer’s critique:
• Evaluation of the peers
critique • Sought
additional literature
supporting or contesting
the original article or
critique • A written
critique of the assigned
peer critique
8 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The following key
components are
somewhat addressed
regarding the assigned
peer’s critique:
• Evaluation of the peers
critique • Sought
additional literature
supporting or contesting
the original article or
critique • A written critique
of the assigned peer
critique
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Examination
of the
Critique
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly
addressed the following
from the chosen peer
critique: • Addressed
whether they agreed with
the critique • Their
assessment of the quality
of the critique • And what
additional critiques or
expanded thoughts they
may have regarding the
peer critique.
9 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
Student proficiently
addressed the following
from the chosen peer
critique: • Addressed
whether they agreed with
the critique • Their
assessment of the quality
of the critique • And what
additional critiques or
expanded thoughts they
may have regarding the
peer critique.
8 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Student somewhat
addressed the following
from the chosen peer
critique: • Addressed
whether they agreed with
the critique • Their
assessment of the quality
of the critique • And what
additional critiques or
expanded thoughts they
may have regarding the
peer critique
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Ethical Leadership Article Critique Peer Review Grading Rubric |
BMAL770_B04_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Support 8 to >7.0 pts
Advanced
Major points are
thoroughly supported by
all of the following:
• Reading & Study
materials; • Course
studies • Pertinent
examples (conceptual
and/or personal);
• Thoughtful analysis
(considering assumptions,
analyzing implications,
and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); • In addition to
the article reviewed, no
less than 1 scholarly
sources, in addition to the
course textbook, in
current APA format; and
• Integration of at least 1
biblical principle.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Major points are mostly
supported by the
following: • Reading &
Study materials;
• Course studies
• Pertinent examples
(conceptual and/or
personal); • Thoughtful
analysis (considering
assumptions, analyzing
implications, and
comparing/contrasting
concepts); • In addition
to the article reviewed, no
less than 1 scholarly
sources, in addition to the
course textbook, in
current APA format; and
• Integration of at least 1
biblical principle.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Major points are
somewhat supported by
some of the following:
• Reading & Study
materials; • Course
studies • Pertinent
examples (conceptual
and/or personal);
• Thoughtful analysis
(considering assumptions,
analyzing implications,
and comparing/contrasting
concepts); • In addition to
the article reviewed, no
less than 1 scholarly
sources, in addition to the
course textbook, in current
APA format; and
• Integration of at least 1
biblical principle.
0 pts
Not
Present
8 pts
Grammar
and Spelling
4 to >3.0 pts
Advanced
Proper spelling and
grammar are used.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1–2 spelling and
grammar errors are
present.
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3–4 spelling and
grammar errors are
present.
0 pts
Not
Present
More
than 4
spelling
and
grammar
errors
are
present.
4 pts
Page Count 4 to >3.0 pts
Advanced
Excluding the cover page,
abstract, and reference,
3-4 pages of scholarly
writing.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Excluding the cover
page, abstract, and
reference, the body is not
within the 3-4 page of
scholarly writing
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Excluding the cover page,
abstract, and reference,
the body is grossly out of
stated page range of
scholarly writing.
0 pts
Not
Present
4 pts
Ethical Leadership Article Critique Peer Review Grading Rubric |
BMAL770_B04_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
APA
Formatting
4 to >3.0 pts
Advanced
The following are
including in APA format
with minimal errors:
• Cover page • Abstract
• Body • Reference page:
All referenced material
must be properly cited
and listed on the
references page. • APA
standards are followed
including double-space,
Times New Roman
12-point or other APA
approved font, 1-inch
margins, no contractions
or unnecessary
(non-heading) bolding.
Use proper APA headings
to improve readability.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
The following are
including in APA format
but have a few errors:
• Cover page • Abstract
• Body • Reference
page: All referenced
material must be properly
cited and listed on the
references page. • APA
standards are followed
including double-space,
Times New Roman
12-point or other APA
approved font, 1-inch
margins, no contractions
or unnecessary
(non-heading) bolding.
Use proper APA headings
to improve readability.
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The following are including
in APA format, but have
many errors: • Cover
page • Abstract • Body
• Reference page: All
referenced material must
be properly cited and
listed on the references
page. • APA standards
are followed including
double-space, Times New
Roman 12-point or other
APA approved font, 1-inch
margins, no contractions
or unnecessary
(non-heading) bolding.
Use proper APA headings
to improve readability.
0 pts
Not
Present
4 pts
Total Points: 40
Ethical Leadership Article Critique Peer Review Grading Rubric |
BMAL770_B04_202140