Dual Relationships Case Study – Rubric Collapse All

Benchmark – Dual Relationships Case Study – Rubric
Collapse All
Description of the Ethical Conflict
39 points
Criteria Description
Description of the Ethical Conflict
5. Excellent
39 points
A description of the ethical conflict is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
4. Good
33.93 points
A description of the ethical conflict is present and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
30.81 points
A description of the ethical conflict is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
28.86 points
A description of the ethical conflict is present, but inaccurate or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the ethical conflict is either missing or not evident to the reader.
Options for Resolving the Ethical Conflict (B)
52 points
Criteria Description
Description of Options for Resolving the Ethical Conflict Including the Interpersonal
Perceptions and Other Considerations That Influence the Options C8.2)
5. Excellent
52 points
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal
perceptions and other considerations that influence the options is thoroughly presented
with rich detail.
4. Good
45.24 points
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal
perceptions and other considerations that influence the options is presented and
thorough.
3. Satisfactory
41.08 points
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal
perceptions and other considerations that influence the options is presented, but is
cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
38.48 points
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal
perceptions and other considerations that influence the options is presented, but illogical
or incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of options for resolving the ethical conflict including the interpersonal
perceptions and other considerations that influence the options is not presented.
Identification of and Rationale for the Preferred Resolution Option (B)
52 points
Criteria Description
Identification of and Rationale for the Preferred Resolution Option (C8.3)
5. Excellent
52 points
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are thoroughly
presented with rich detail and substantial support.
4. Good
45.24 points
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are presented and
thorough.
3. Satisfactory
41.08 points
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are presented, but
are cursory and lacking in depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
38.48 points
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are presented, but
illogical.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An identification of and rationale for the preferred resolution option are either missing or
not evident to the reader.
Proposed Steps to Avoid Similar Situations
39 points
Criteria Description
Proposed Steps to Avoid Similar Situations
5. Excellent
39 points
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are thoroughly presented with rich detail and
substantial support.
4. Good
33.93 points
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are presented and thorough.
3. Satisfactory
30.81 points
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are presented, but are cursory and lacking in
depth.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
28.86 points
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are presented, but illogical.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Proposed steps to avoid similar situations are either missing or not evident to the reader.
Synthesis and Argument
26 points
Criteria Description
Synthesis and Argument (C7.2)
5. Excellent
26 points
Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and
convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All
sources are authoritative.
4. Good
22.62 points
Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical
progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
20.54 points
Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may
have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.
Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible.
Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
19.24 points
Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification
of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a
justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses non-credible sources.
Thesis Development and Purpose (B)
26 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose (C7.1)
5. Excellent
26 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is
contained within the thesis.
4. Good
22.62 points
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are
descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
20.54 points
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
19.24 points
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Mechanics of Writing
13 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing
5. Excellent
13 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
11.31 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of
sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
10.27 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.62 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
APA Format
13 points
Criteria Description
APA Format
5. Excellent
13 points
The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete
and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
4. Good
11.31 points
Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes).
Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate
and citation style is usually correct.
3. Satisfactory
10.27 points
Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page,
margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.62 points
Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is
apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text
citations are used.
Total 260 points