Specific health, economic, and cultural needs

8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 2/7
CRITERIA 1
Design an individualized, patient-centered concept map, based upon the best available
evidence for treating a patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs.
COMPETENCY
Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not design an individualized, patient-centered concept map based on the best available evidence for
treating a patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs.
BASIC:
Designs a patient-centered concept map, but the map is not well individualized to treat a specific patient’s
health, economic, or cultural needs.
PROFICIENT:
Designs an individualized, patient-centered concept map based on the best available evidence for treating a
patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs.
DISTINGUISHED:
Designs an individualized, patient-centered concept map based on the best available evidence for treating a
patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs, and identifies. Outcomes for each diagnosis are
aligned and complementary.
Comments:
You have a nice start to your concept map with some good information. You can achieve a higher level by
adding more specific details and information. Also, by developing specific nursing diagnosis and outcomes
that align to these needs and diagnosis. I would recommend you use the provided template to complete your
concept map. See link below.
Concept Map Template [DOCX].
8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 3/7
CRITERIA 2
Analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in
the concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
COMPETENCY
Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the
concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
BASIC:
Attempts to analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the
concept map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
PROFICIENT:
Analyzes the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept map
will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle.
DISTINGUISHED:
Analyzes the needs of a patient, and those of their family, to ensure that the intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and appropriate for their beliefs, values, and lifestyle. Identifies unanswered
questions or areas of uncertainty where further information could improve the analysis.
Comments:
Very good analysis and discussion on needs of patient and family. Very good identification of priority nursing
diagnosis. Very detailed. Very good discussion on exercise, Great to identify depression as a priority need.
Very insightful discussion on cultural considerations.
8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 4/7
CRITERIA 3
Determine the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered
concept map.
COMPETENCY
Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not determine the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept
map.
BASIC:
Partially determines the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept
map.
PROFICIENT:
Determines the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept map.
DISTINGUISHED:
Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept map, and
impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.
Comments:
Your evidence is relevant and supports your discussion and concept map. Perspectives addressed throughout
paper You achieved the level of distinguished for this criteria.
8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 5/7
CRITERIA 4
Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to
achieve.
COMPETENCY
Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not propose criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve.
BASIC:
Proposes insufficient or inappropriate criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve.
PROFICIENT:
Proposes relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve.
DISTINGUISHED:
Proposes relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes the patient needs to achieve and
acknowledges challenges specific to such an evaluation process.
Comments:
Good discussion on evaluation of outcomes. Good strategies proposed to evaluate. Good discussion on BS
evaluation. You can achieve the level of distinguished by addressing other criteria. Otherwise, good job.
8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 6/7
CRITERIA 5
Develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive way.
COMPETENCY
Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive way.
BASIC:
Develops a strategy for communicating with patients and their families that falls short of being ethical,
culturally sensitive, or inclusive.
PROFICIENT:
Develops a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and
inclusive way.
DISTINGUISHED:
Develops a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and
inclusive way, and identifies assumptions on which the strategy is based.
Comments:
Very good discussion on therapeutic communication. However,I did not see specific discussion on
communication strategies to promote communication with patient and family. What specific techniques would
you use for this patient and family? You can achieve a higher level by addressing this and assumptions on
which strategies are based.
8/30/2021 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 7/7
CRITERIA 6
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly
formatting citations and references using APA style.
COMPETENCY
Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
NON_PERFORMANCE:
Does not integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions; does not correctly
format citations and references using APA style.
BASIC: Sources lack relevance or credibility, are poorly integrated, or are incorrectly formatted.
PROFICIENT:
Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and
references using APA style.
DISTINGUISHED:
Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations
and references using APA style. Citations are error-free.
Comments:
Your paper was well written and organized, with very good APA format. Very good use of headings in APA
format. You achieved the level of distinguished for this criteria.