There is a wealth of information

A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y
Hid
e
A
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t In
f
o
r
m
a
tio
n InstructionsHIST 115 6981 World
His
t
o
r
y I (2
2
2
2) J
S
A
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t
s
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y
D
u
e
Tu
e
s
d
a
y
b
y
1
1:5
9
p
m
E
T. Ple
a
s
e
b
e
s
u
r
e
t
o
r
e
a
d
t
h
e
a
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
c
rip
tio
n in
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t in
s
t
r
u
c
tio
n
s
b
elo
w. Assignment Instructions There is a wealth of information
a
v
aila
ble in
t
h
e
t
r
a
ditio
n
al f
o
r
m
a
t
s
o
f
b
o
o
k
s, j
o
u
r
n
als, a
n
d
n
e
w
s
p
a
p
e
r
s. U
M
G
C’s lib
r
a
r
y
s
u
b
s
c
rib
e
s
t
o
m
a
n
y
d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
t
ain
s
u
c
h
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s, w
hic
h
a
r
e
a
v
aila
ble in
ele
c
t
r
o
nic
f
o
r
m
a
t. For this assignment, you will d
o
a
s
e
a
r
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
U
M
G
C
Lib
r
a
r
y’s
d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e
s
f
o
r
Fiv
e
(
5
)
a
r
ticle
s in
s
c
h
ola
rly
(
p
e
e
r
–
r
e
vie
w
e
d
)
j
o
u
r
n
als
o
n
y
o
u
r
c
h
o
s
e
n
t
o
pic. E
a
c
h
cit
a
tio
n
s
h
o
uld
b
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
5
0
–
3
0
0
w
o
r
d
s
e
a
c
h. To access th
e
U
M
G
C
Lib
r
a
r
y, clic
k
o
n
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s in
t
h
e
N
a
vig
a
tio
n
b
a
r
a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
u
r
s
e. S
ele
c
t
Lib
r
a
r
y. For help
wit
h
t
his
y
o
u
s
h
o
uld
r
e
vie
w
t
his
s
o
u
r
c
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
U
M
G
C
W
ritin
g
C
e
n
t
e
r: https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/writin
g
–
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
/
e
v
alu
a
tin
g
–
s
o
u
r
c
e
s.c
f
m. Select a topic that will form the ba
sis
f
o
r
y
o
u
r
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y
a
n
d
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
We
blio
g
r
a
p
h
y
(
y
o
u
r
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
We
blio
g
r
a
p
h
y is
d
u
e in
We
e
k
7
). Yo
u
s
h
o
uld
c
h
o
o
s
e
s
o
m
e
t
o
pic
t
h
a
t
d
e
als
wit
h
s
o
m
e
a
s
p
e
c
t
o
f
w
o
rld
his
t
o
r
y
t
o
1
5
0
0. T
his
c
o
v
e
r
s
a
b
r
o
a
d
a
r
e
a
s
o
y
o
u
c
a
n
u
s
e
y
o
u
r im
a
gin
a
tio
n. F
o
r
e
x
a
m
ple, y
o
u
c
o
uld
c
o
v
e
r
E
g
y
p
tia
n
A
g
ric
ult
u
r
e, m
e
die
v
al w
e
a
p
o
n
r
y, o
r
R
o
m
a
n
a
q
u
e
d
u
c
t
s
t
o
n
a
m
e
a
f
e
w. If
y
o
u
a
r
e
u
n
s
u
r
e
w
h
e
t
h
e
r
y
o
u
r
t
o
pic is
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
ble, y
o
u
s
h
o
uld
r
u
n it
b
y
y
o
u
r in
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
f
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
al. Provide a
c
o
m
ple
t
e
cit
a
tio
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
sit
e, in
clu
din
g
t
h
e
U
R
L
a
n
d
y
o
u
r
d
a
t
e
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s. N
o
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
q
uir
e
d
cit
a
tio
n
s
t
yle is
C
hic
a
g
o
M
a
n
u
al o
f
S
t
yle. F
o
r
a
n
e
x
a
m
ple
o
f
w
h
a
t
ele
m
e
n
t
s
t
o in
clu
d
e in
y
o
u
r
cit
a
tio
n, g
o
t
o
C
o
u
r
s
e
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
a
n
d
r
e
vie
w
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s in
t
h
e
C
hic
a
g
o
S
t
yle
m
o
d
ule. In
t
h
e
S
a
m
ple
Cit
a
tio
n
s
s
e
c
tio
n, lo
o
k
u
n
d
e
r
O
nlin
e
J
o
u
r
n
al A
r
ticle
s
a
n
d
n
o
t
e
t
h
a
t
y
o
u
n
e
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
vid
e
t
h
e
n
a
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e
y
o
u
f
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
a
r
ticle in
a
n
d
y
o
u
r
d
a
t
e
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s. S
u
b
mit
y
o
u
r
p
a
p
e
r in
M
S
W
o
r
d
o
r
d
o
c
x
f
o
r
m
a
t. Analytical Annotated
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y
C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s: 1. Begin each annotated bibliography entry by ide
n
tif
yin
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
r
c
e in
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
C
hic
a
g
o
M
a
n
u
al o
f
S
t
yle
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
tio
n. 2. A brief description
o
f
t
h
e
a
u
t
h
o
r’s
t
o
pic, t
h
e
sis, a
n
d
m
e
t
h
o
d
olo
g
y. In
o
t
h
e
r
w
o
r
d
s, in
w
h
a
t
a
c
a
d
e
mic
dis
ciplin
e
d
o
e
s
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
f
all in (his
t
o
r
y, lit
e
r
a
t
u
r
e, s
o
cial s
cie
n
c
e, w
o
m
e
n’s
s
t
u
die
s, c
ult
u
r
al studies, etc.)? What kind of evidence does the author draw upon? 3. A concise outline of the main points in the text. 4. A statement about the author’s goals and his/her intended audience. Are there any clear biases? 5. MOST IMPORTANTLY–Your critical evaluation of the text’s usefulness for the investigation of your topic. What are the strengths of the source? What are the deficiencies or limitations of the source? 6. Did the article help you to further understand the topic? If so, explain how. If not, explain what information might have been helpful. 7. Explain how each of your sources compares to the others. Are there any general trends you see in your selected books and articles? There are numerous websites that will show you how to construct an annotated bibliography. UMGC also has a guide to writing an annotated bibliography (requires Flash Player to view the video) https://sites.umgc.edu/library/libhow/bibliography_tutorial.cfm If your article has an abstract DO NOT CUT AND PASTE IT AND SUBMIT IT. That is plagiarism and will result in an investigation of your paper for a possible violation of the university’s academic 115 Annotated Bibliography Rubric 250 Points Course: HIST 115 6981 World History I (2222) Source 1 A+50 points A45 points B40 points C35 points D30 points F0 points Criterion Score Source 1 is worth up to 50 points Annotation / 50 and Citation perfectly carry out all requirement s below. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.). 2. Concise outline of main points. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. 4. Usefulness for the investigation of your topic: strengths, deficiencies. 5. How / Whether article helped you All areas of Annotation and Citation listed below are strong with 1 or 2 minor errors total. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.). 2. Concise outline of main points. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. 4. Usefulness for the investigation of your topic: strengths, deficiencies. 5. How / Whether article All areas of Annotation and Citation listed below are strong with 3 or 4 minor errors total. OR 1 subfield of Analysis needs strengthenin g while all other areas of Annotation and Citation are strong. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.). 2. Concise outline of main points. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. All areas of Annotation and Citation listed below are strong with 5-7 minor errors total. OR 2 subfields of Analysis need strengthenin g while all other areas of Annotation and Citation are strong. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.). 2. Concise outline of main points. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. All areas of Annotation and Citation listed below are strong with abundant minor errors. OR Citation does not resemble Chicago Style. OR 3 or more subfields of Analysis need strengthenin g while other areas of Annotation and Citation are reasonably strong. OR Source is not credible & academically acceptable. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline Areas of Annotation and Citation listed below exhibit abundant minor errors, and Citation does not resemble Chicago Style. OR 4 or more subfields of Analysis need strengthenin g. OR Source is not credible & academically acceptable. Annotation & Citation Criteria _____ Chicago Style Bibliographi c Citation _____ Analysis: 1) Brief description of author’s topic, thesis, and methodolog y, including kinds of evidence, and discipline (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.). 2. Concise outline of
A
d
d
a
File
R
e
c
o
r
d
A
u
dio
Hid
e
R
u
b
ric
s
R
u
b
ric
N
a
m
e: 1
1
5
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y
R
u
b
ric
2
5
0
P
oin
t
s
S
u
b
mit
A
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t
File
s
t
o
s
u
b
mit
(
0
)
file
(
s
)
t
o
s
u
b
mit
A
f
t
e
r
u
plo
a
din
g, y
o
u
m
u
s
t
clic
k
S
u
b
mit
t
o
c
o
m
ple
t
e
t
h
e
s
u
b
mis
sio
n. Comments integrity policy. Read the article and do your own summary. This assignment can be time consuming so do not let it get away from
y
o
u. If
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
a
n
y
q
u
e
s
tio
n
s
ple
a
s
e
e
m
ail y
o
u
r in
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
s
o
o
n
e
r
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n la
t
e
r. T
h
e
r
u
b
ric
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y is
a
v
aila
ble
a
t
t
h
e
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
s
e in
s
t
r
u
c
tio
n
s. You will find a sample Annotated Bibliogr
a
p
h
y in
t
h
e
m
o
d
ule la
b
ele
d
”
S
a
m
ple
A
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t
s.”
Yo
u
m
a
y
n
o
t
u
s
e
t
h
e
a
r
ticle
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
a
m
ple. A
d
ditio
n
ally, t
h
e
s
a
m
ple
a
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t is
m
e
a
n
t
a
s
a
g
uid
elin
e
a
s
t
o
w
h
a
t
a
n ‘A’ p
a
p
e
r is
a
n
d is
n
o
t in
t
e
n
d
e
d
t
o
b
e
a ‘p
e
r
f
e
c
t’ a
s
sig
n
m
e
n
t. Assignments must be submitted as a Word document. This means that
t
h
e
file
n
a
m
e
will e
n
d in .d
o
c
a
s in
t
h
e
f
ollo
win
g
e
x
a
m
ple: J
o
h
n
s
o
n
_
A
n
n
o
t
a
t
e
d
_
Biblio
g
r
a
p
h
y.d
o
c If there is a problem with this requirement, contact me. P
rin
t
R
u
b
ric
S
o
u
r
c
e
1
A
+
5
0
p
oin
t
s
A45
p
oin
t
s
B4
0
p
oin
t
s
C3
5
p
oin
t
s
D30
p
oin
t
s
F0
p
oin
t
s
C
rit
e
rio
n
S
c
o
r
e
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
t
o
pic
?
6. H
o
w
e
a
c
h
s
o
u
r
c
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
s (general trends tha
t
y
o
u
s
e
e in
y
o
u
r
b
o
o
k
s
a
n
d
a
r
ticle
s). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. h
elp
e
d
y
o
u
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
t
o
pic
?
6. H
o
w
e
a
c
h
s
o
u
r
c
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
s (general trends tha
t
y
o
u
s
e
e in
y
o
u
r
b
o
o
k
s
a
n
d
a
r
ticle
s). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. 4. Us
e
f
uln
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e investig
a
tio
n
o
f
y
o
u
r
t
o
pic: streng
t
h
s, deficiencie
s. 5. How / Whether article helped you further understand the topic? 6. How each source compares to the others (general trends that you see in your books and articles). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. 4. Us
e
f
uln
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e investig
a
tio
n
o
f
y
o
u
r
t
o
pic: streng
t
h
s, deficiencie
s. 5. How / Whether article helped you further understand the topic? 6. How each source compares to the others (general trends that you see in your books and articles). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. (his
t
o
r
y, literatur
e, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, et
c.). 2. Concise outline of main points. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. 4. Usefulness for the investigation of your topic: strengths, deficiencies. 5. How / Whether article helped you further understand the topic? 6. How each source compares to the others (general trends that you see in your books and articles). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. m
ain
p
oin
t
s. 3. Author’s goals, intended audience, and biases. 4. Usefulness for the investigation of your topic: strengths, deficiencies. 5. How / Whether article helped you further understand the topic? 6. How each source compares to the others (general trends that you see in your books and articles). _____ Credible & Academicall y Acceptable _____ Writing: 1. Well constructed sentences. 2. Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and appropriate word choice. Source 2 A+50 points A45 points B40 points C35 points D30 points F0 points
C
rit
e
rio
n
S
c
o
r
e
S
u
b
mit
C
a
n
c
el
Source 2
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 2
is worth
up to 50
points
Annotation / 50
and Citation
perfectly
carries out
all
requirement
s.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 1 or 2
minor errors
total.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 3 or 4
minor errors
total.
OR
1 subfield of
Analysis
needs
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 5-7
minor errors
total.
OR
2 subfields
of Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with
abundant
minor errors.
OR
Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
3 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are
reasonably
strong.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Areas of
Annotation
and Citation
exhibit
abundant
minor errors,
and Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
4 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Source 3
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 3
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 3
is worth
up to 50
points
Annotation / 50
and Citation
perfectly
carries out
all
requirement
s.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 1 or 2
minor errors
total.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 3 or 4
minor errors
total.
OR
1 subfield of
Analysis
needs
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 5-7
minor errors
total.
OR
2 subfields
of Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with
abundant
minor errors.
OR
Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
3 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are
reasonably
strong.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Areas of
Annotation
and Citation
exhibit
abundant
minor errors,
and Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
4 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Source 4
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 4
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 5
is worth
up to 50
points
Annotation / 50
and Citation
perfectly
carries out
all
requirement
s.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 1 or 2
minor errors
total.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 3 or 4
minor errors
total.
OR
1 subfield of
Analysis
needs
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 5-7
minor errors
total.
OR
2 subfields
of Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with
abundant
minor errors.
OR
Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
3 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are
reasonably
strong.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Areas of
Annotation
and Citation
exhibit
abundant
minor errors,
and Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
4 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Source 5
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Total / 250
Overall Score
Source 5
A+
50 points
A
45 points
B
40 points
C
35 points
D
30 points
F
0 points
Criterion
Score
Source 5
is worth
up to 50
points
Annotation / 50
and Citation
perfectly
carries out
all
requirement
s.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 1 or 2
minor errors
total.
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 3 or 4
minor errors
total.
OR
1 subfield of
Analysis
needs
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with 5-7
minor errors
total.
OR
2 subfields
of Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while all
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
All areas of
Annotation
and Citation
are strong
with
abundant
minor errors.
OR
Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
3 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g while
other areas
of
Annotation
and Citation
are
reasonably
strong.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
Areas of
Annotation
and Citation
exhibit
abundant
minor errors,
and Citation
does not
resemble
Chicago
Style.
OR
4 or more
subfields of
Analysis
need
strengthenin
g.
OR
Source is not
credible &
academically
acceptable.
_____
See Source 1
for review of
requirement
s.
A+
250 points
minimum
A: Superior
225 points
minimum
B: Exceeds
Expectations
200 points
minimum
C: Meets
Expectations
175 points
minimum
D: Below
Expectations
150 points
minimum
F: Failing
0 points
minimum