Three: Case Scenario 3 Guidelines and Rubric

PSY 622 Milestone Three: Case Scenario 3 Guidelines and Rubric
(Substance Abuse Potential)
Prompt: Review the collateral information of Case Scenario 3. In the Assessment Data section, review the raw data of the SASSI-3. Appropriately interpret the
scores. Based on your review of Therapeutic Risk Typologies, provide a one to two page recommendations report for child protective services and probation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Substance Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 3)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
Guidelines for Submission: The recommendations report should follow these formatting guidelines: 1–2 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Substance Abuse
Potential: Daubert
Comprehensively assesses the
extent to which the case study
data set meets the Daubert
standard
Assesses the extent to which the
case study data set meets the
Daubert standard but with gaps in
accuracy or detail
Does not assess the extent to
which the case study data set
meets the Daubert standard
18
Substance Abuse
Potential: Interview
Information
Evaluates interview information
appropriately for its implications
in the risk assessment process
and substantiates claims with
specific research
Evaluates information but
evaluation is not appropriate to
the situation, or does not
substantiate claims with research
Does not evaluate interview
information
18
Substance Abuse
Potential: Collateral
Information
Evaluates collateral information
appropriately for its implications
in the risk assessment and
recommendations process and
substantiates claims with specific
research
Evaluates collateral information
but evaluation is not appropriate
to the situation, or does not
substantiate claims with research
Does not evaluate collateral
information
18
Substance Abuse
Potential:
Recommendations
Proposes appropriate
recommendations and justifies
with research
Proposes recommendations that
are not appropriate to the
situation, or does not justify with
research
Does not propose
recommendations
18
Substance Abuse
Potential: Ethical
Guidelines
Employs appropriate ethical
guidelines of a professional
organization in making
recommendations
Employs ethical guidelines but
guidelines are not appropriate to
the situation or are not supported
by a professional organization
Does not employ ethical
guidelines
18
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%